On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:52 AM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com>wrote: > 4. Even if I make patch in my Mercurial clone - you still can't pull > it and I have to attach it to tracker. No gain. > Was there ever any discussion about hosting the central repository on a site such as bitbucket or github? I tried searching the python-dev archives but was unable to find much. Anyway... assuming there's a at least a clone of the central repository on one of those sites, you can fork it and work on your patch there. A core developer can then pull your patch to their local repository, tweak it as needed, then commit it to the central repository. > I would put accent on keeping mirror of Subversion as easy way to > contribute for those who are not yet ready for DVCS. Subversion also > provides greater interoperability. Assuming that any modern DVCS tool > may act as Subversion client, we will gain more contributors if we > won't try to force people use Python and Mercurial. > The hg-git tool allows Mercurial and git to interoperate, so that's not as much of an issue as it once was. It's geared toward using a Mercurial client to talk to a git server, but I'm told it can work the other way around with a bit of work. -- Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D. President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC <http://stutzbachenterprises.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100701/07259546/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4