> As Windows doesn't run on non-x86 architectures, their naming is > generally just Windows <Whatever> (32 bit) and Windows <Whatever> (64 bit). Windows actually does - it runs on IA-64 (which is a non-x86 architecture). However, end users are unlikely to use such hardware, so distinguishing between 32-bit and 64-bit is typically good enough. > In this case, making it clear that the 64-bit Windows binaries work for > both Intel and AMD chips is more important than using only the official > architecture name. Well, we did have Itanium binaries at one point, and the "64-bit Windows binaries" you are referring to most definitely don't run on Itanium, even though that's an Intel chip. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4