2010/1/11 Jack Diederich <jackdied at gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: >> As an example, the one library I've already ported used a metaclass. I don't >> see any way to specify that the metaclass should be used in a portable way. >> In Python 2.6 it's: >> >> class Foo: >> __metaclass__ = Meta >> >> and in Python 3 it's: >> >> class Foo(metaclass=Meta): >> >> 2to3 made that pain go away. > > [sidebar] > 1) the metaclass fixer was a PITA to implement. Does this make it any less useful, though? :) -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4