RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jan 12 01:28:26 CET 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-January/097243.html

Andrew Bennetts <andrew <at> bemusement.org> writes:
> 
> But a hypothetical 2.8 would also give people a way to move closer to
> py3k without giving up on using all their 2.x-only dependencies.  I
> think it's much more likely that libraries like Twisted can support 2.8
> in the near future than 3.x.

I don't think a 2.8 could make you much closer to 3.x. AFAICT, every possible
way to ease transition to 3.x will already be in 2.7, or almost. But perhaps I'm
lacking imagination.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-January/097243.html below:

[Python-Dev] [RELEASED] Python 2.7 alpha 2