+1 from me. (With the caveat that "time will tell" is definitely the ultimate answer. Plans may change unexpectedly, even though we don't expect them to.) PS. I'm surprised that Martin thinks that the -3 mode in 2.6 is not helpful. But I trust he has ported a lot more code to 3.x than I have personally. Are there other experiences? --Guido On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:44 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >> So, it should say "Guido wants 2.7 to be the last main version of >> Python 2, so it probably will be. We promise to release bugfixes it >> for, like, ages". >> >> No need to be needlessly formal. :-D > > That summarizes my understanding of what Guido said fairly well :-) > > +1 for putting it into the announcements. > > Regards, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4