On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 06:57, Brian Curtin <brian.curtin at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 06:57, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I believe someone (Daniel Diniz, maybe?) did do a pass over those some >> time in the last 12 months, so most of the obviously irrelevant ones >> that are that old should already be gone. Not to say it isn't worth >> doing another pass, just saying not to get disheartened if there aren't >> many that can be readily closed. >> >> There are at least a few still kicking around just because they're >> difficult to deal with (there's an ancient one to do with one of the >> ways circular imports can fail that I occasionally go back and reread >> before moving on to something more tractable). >> >> Cheers, >> Nick. >> > > On the topic of bugs that can be readily closed (literally), I've recently > come across a number of issues which appear to be sitting in a patch or > review stage, but their patches have been committed and the issue remains > open. What is the best course of action there? I'd just go ahead and close > the issue myself but I don't have tracker privileges. > > If a core developer is willing to step forward and vouch for you to get tracker privileges then I will give them to you. We are trying to give out tracker privs w/ less time than required to get commit privileges. So as long as you have helped out on a few issues in a positive and correct way that should be enough to get one of the regulars who perform triage to notice. -Brett I'm willing to help out with another Daniel Diniz-esque triage sweep if that > would help. > > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100106/f24c9595/attachment-0007.htm>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4