A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-January/097033.html below:

new 3 release with backwards compatibility

[Python-Dev] Suggestion: new 3 release with backwards compatibilityLennart Regebro regebro at gmail.com
Tue Jan 5 18:52:20 CET 2010
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 17:10, Juan Fernando Herrera J.
<juanfhj at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm eager to use 3, but paradoxically,
> the 3 release makes me rather stuck with 2.6. Excuse me if this has been
> suggested in the past.

Yes. Python 3 is not what you want to use today if you write
applications. If you write libraries 2010 is the year to port, IMO.
With some luck, 2011 will be the year to start porting applications
properly. We'll see.

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4