On 05/01/2010 16:10, Juan Fernando Herrera J. wrote: > How about a new python 3 release with (possibly partial) backwards > compatibility with 2.6? I'm a big 3 fan, but I'm dismayed at the way > major software hasn't been ported to it. I'm eager to use 3, but > paradoxically, the 3 release makes me rather stuck with 2.6. Excuse me > if this has been suggested in the past. > I don't know about other developers, but I certainly expected Python 3 adoption to take a few years due to libraries only gradually making the jump. I also expected there to be nervousness and pain around the migration as well. I think in fact that libraries *are* migrating and there are lots of encouraging signs. As a community we need to do all we can to promote Python 3 adoption, but I don't think there is much reason to be worried (or complacent for that matter). All the best, Michael Foord > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100105/d7b6baac/attachment-0007.htm>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4