A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-January/097029.html below:

[Python-Dev] Suggestion: new 3 release with backwards compatibility

[Python-Dev] Suggestion: new 3 release with backwards compatibility [Python-Dev] Suggestion: new 3 release with backwards compatibilityJuan Fernando Herrera J. juanfhj at gmail.com
Tue Jan 5 17:10:16 CET 2010
How about a new python 3 release with (possibly partial) backwards
compatibility with 2.6? I'm a big 3 fan, but I'm dismayed at the way major
software hasn't been ported to it. I'm eager to use 3, but paradoxically,
the 3 release makes me rather stuck with 2.6. Excuse me if this has been
suggested in the past.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100105/7839cf7b/attachment-0007.htm>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4