On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote: > On 26/02/2010 17:26, skip at pobox.com wrote: >> >> >> Â Â http://www.staringispolite.com/likepython/ >> >> Simon> I'm reminded of LOLPython:<http://bit.ly/271rt>. >> >> You know, I'm thinking while both are obviously tongue-in-cheek we should >> probably include them on the /dev/implementations page of python.org, >> probably in a separate section at the end of the page. >> > > They're certainly fun - but they seem to be fly-by-night projects (i.e. > unlikely to be maintained in the long run). The risk is that we end up with > even more outdated links / material on the website. > > Anyway, if the consensus is that it would be good to link to them then I > will update the page (which could already do with some updating by the looks > of it). > Sure, we can link to them, and then add titles to all job postings like "Ninja" and "Wizard" so we can really seem awesome.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4