A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-February/097804.html below:

[Python-Dev] Update xml.etree.ElementTree for Python 2.7 and 3.2

[Python-Dev] Update xml.etree.ElementTree for Python 2.7 and 3.2 [Python-Dev] Update xml.etree.ElementTree for Python 2.7 and 3.2"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Sat Feb 20 08:57:50 CET 2010
> We need someone to maintain the copy of ElementTree in the Python
> repository.

We have one: Fredrik Lundh.

> Ideally this means pulling upgrades and bugfixes from
> Fredrik's repository every now and then. If the goals of Python
> ElementTree and Fredrik ElementTree diverge I don't see a problem with
> an amicable fork.

I see one: Fredrik will not consider such a fork amicable. Of course, if
you could make him state in public that he is fine with a procedure that
you propose, go ahead. He had stated in public that he is fine with the
procedure I'm defending right now, that's why I'm defending it: no
substantial changes without his explicit approval (breakage due to
language changes is about the only exception - not even bug fixes are
allowed).

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4