On 2010-02-19 14:45, Eric Smith wrote: > Sjoerd Mullender wrote: >> On 2010-02-19 14:10, Guido van Rossum wrote: >>> Isn't mhlib itself deprecated? (It's gone in Py3k.) >> >> I wouldn't like that, but it is beside my point. If a module is >> deprecated, then it should not be used in released code. >> If mhlib is deprecated, it doesn't tell you about it. mhlib uses >> multifile and multifile does tell you it is deprecated, and that is >> pretty annoying. > > This is because no one has gotten around to it. Create a bug report for > it, and preferably attach a patch with tests. My point is, as a matter of *policy*, nothing should be released that uses deprecated stuff. I can't create a bug report about wrong (or incomplete) policies. > Eric. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/sjoerd.mullender%40cwi.nl -- Sjoerd Mullender -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 371 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100219/b187aad0/attachment-0001.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4