RetroSearch Browse

Sat Feb 13 03:23:31 CET 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-February/097646.html

Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2010/2/12 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>:
>> Brett Cannon wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:17, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>>> I vote on giving up the 2to3 sandbox.
>> One other point - is there a Python 2.6 backwards compatibility
>> restriction on 2to3 at the moment? If there isn't, should there be?
> 
> I try to keep it compatible with 2.6, since we have to backport changes.

With 2.7 just around the corner, it should probably be listed in PEP 291
on that basis.

Of course, PEP 291 could do with a list of 2.5 and 2.6 specific features
first...

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-February/097646.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 385 progress report