2010/2/12 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>: > Brett Cannon wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:17, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >> I vote on giving up the 2to3 sandbox. > > One other point - is there a Python 2.6 backwards compatibility > restriction on 2to3 at the moment? If there isn't, should there be? I try to keep it compatible with 2.6, since we have to backport changes. -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4