On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:17, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >> Why even keep 2to3 in the sandbox? It should be mature enough now to be >> maintained directly in the tree. > > I think the original plan was to make standalone releases, so that > people could upgrade their installation from a newer release of 2to3. > That's what I remember as well. > IMO, it is realistic to predict that this will not actually happen. If > we can agree to give up the 2to3 sandbox, we should incorporate > find_pattern into the tree, and perhaps test.py as well. I vote on giving up the 2to3 sandbox. -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4