2010/2/7 Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan at ochtman.nl>: > It's been a long time! Thank you very much for staying on this task! I'm still excited. > > In fact, a few weeks ago I talked to Brett and we figured that we > should probably pin down a deadline. We discussed aiming at May 1, and > at this time I think that should be feasible. That also seems to > coincide with the release of 2.7b2, though, so maybe we need to do it > one week later (or sooner?). Anyway, we figured that a weekend would > probably be a good time. If we manage to find a good date, I'll put it > in the PEP. How about a week after, so we have more time to adjust release procedures? > Any questions and/or concerns? Will you do test conversions of the sandbox projects, too? Also I think we should have some document (perhaps the dev FAQ) explaining exactly how to do common tasks in mercurial. For example - A bug fix, which needs to be in 4 branches. - A bug fix, which only belongs in 2.7 and 2.6 or 3.2 and 3.1. - Which way do we merge (What's a subset of what?) -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4