On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:58:24 +0100, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at haypocalc.com> wrote: > Le mardi 28 décembre 2010 à 11:40 +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit : > > Am 28.12.2010 11:28, schrieb Victor Stinner: > > > Le lundi 27 décembre 2010 à 23:07 -0500, R. David Murray a écrit : > > >> On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 02:49:27 +0100, victor.stinner <python-checkins at python.org> wrote: > > >>> Author: victor.stinner > > >>> Date: Mon Dec 27 02:49:26 2010 > > >>> New Revision: 87504 > > >>> > > >>> Log: > > >>> Issue #9738: Document encodings of error and warning functions > > > > > >> ASCII-encoded string, or ASCII encoding-string? > > > > > > Oh, I don't really care. Which one do you prefer? I used "ASCII-encoded > > > string" and "UTF-8 encoded string", because "UTF-8-encoded" has too many > > > "-". I should maybe be uniformized. > > > > David's other concern was whether it should be "encod*ed*" or > > "encod*ing*". > > Ooops, it's ASCII-encoded string (and not ASCII-encoding string): fixed > by r87529. Yes, exactly. Sorry for being a bit too subtle in my error report. -- R. David Murray www.bitdance.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4