On 12/26/2010 1:41 PM, Sven Brauch wrote: > Hi there, > > I recently filed a feature request in the tracker to change the > behaviour of the parser in terms of setting ranges on attribute AST > nodes, because I'm working on an application which needs more > information than is currently provided. I suggested to change the > behaviour from > foo.bar.baz #<- foo is said to start at column 0, bar at 0 and baz at > 0 (current) > to > foo.bar.baz #<- foo starts at 0, bar at 3 and baz at 7 (suggestion) > > In that discussion, there's been different opinions about which > behaviour is better; main arguments were "consistency" for the current > and "usefulness" for the suggested behaviour. It has been proposed to > ask the question on this list, that's why I'm doing that now. :) > The thread can be found here: http://bugs.python.org/issue10769 > > So, which version do you think to be better: the current one or the > suggested one? The current one is better, but maybe bar at 4 and baz at 8 would be even better. In other words, I don't think pointing at the "." is useful? Was that your intention? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20101226/d4cbe02d/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4