RetroSearch Browse

Fri Dec 24 19:56:06 CET 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-December/106997.html

On 12/24/2010 11:09 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
> On 22/12/2010 02:26, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 12/21/2010 7:17 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
>>
>> My first priority is that doc and code match.
>> Close second is consistency (hence, ease of learning and use) between
>> various AssertXs.
>>
>>> Symmetrical diffs (element in first not in second, element in second not
>>> in first) solves the problem without imposing an order on the arguments.
>>
>> Where applicable, I prefer this as unambiguous output headings.
>>
> Could you explain what you mean?

I was referring back to an output example symmetric diff that was 
clipped somewhere along the way:

In x not in y:
...
In y not in x:
...

rather than just using -,+ prefixes which are not necessarily 
self-explanatory. 'Not applicable' would refer to output from difflib 
which necessarily is ordered.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-December/106997.html below:

[Python-Dev] r87389 - in python/branches/py3k: Doc/library/unittest.rst Lib/unittest/case.py Misc/NEWS