On 22/12/2010 02:26, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 12/21/2010 7:17 AM, Michael Foord wrote: > > My first priority is that doc and code match. > Close second is consistency (hence, ease of learning and use) between > various AssertXs. > >> Symmetrical diffs (element in first not in second, element in second not >> in first) solves the problem without imposing an order on the arguments. > > Where applicable, I prefer this as unambiguous output headings. > Could you explain what you mean? All the best, Michael Foord -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4