A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-December/106982.html below:

[Python-Dev] r87445 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/numbers.py

[Python-Dev] r87445 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/numbers.py [Python-Dev] r87445 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/numbers.pyÉric Araujo merwok at netwok.org
Thu Dec 23 22:09:15 CET 2010
Le 23/12/2010 20:55, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
>>      def __index__(self):
>> -        """index(self)"""
>> +        """someobject[self]"""
> 
> This is misleading as to what the method actually does,
Really?  Unless I misunderstood the docs, __index__ is used when the
object is used as an index (or with bin or oct, but I didn’t want to
complicate the docstring, just fix it).

On IRC, R. David Murray said that I could just have deleted the
docstring.  I agree with that: I think magic methods never need a
docstring, since they’re documented once and for all in the language
reference.  (__init__ is not an exception: its parameters can be
documented in the class docstring.)

> as you can read in the implementation:
>>          return int(self)
The fact that __index__ is implemented thanks to int/__int__ here is a
detail IMO.

Regards

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4