On Dec 16, 2010, at 03:41 AM, Éric Araujo wrote: >I noticed that changes related to PEP 3147 and PEP 3149 in Doc haven’t >been accompanied by versionadded/versionchanged directives. > >Is that on purpose, meaning that everyone should be aware of these PEPs >when reading 3.2 docs, or just an oversight? It's an oversight. The changes should be accompanied by version* directives. I see you already committed a change for compileall.rst - thanks for that! Please feel free to add anything you find missing or submit a bug report and assign it to me. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20101215/697d7464/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4