Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:20:04 +1000 > Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 from me. >> >> If anyone complains too much, perhaps we can offer to retain the old >> ConfigParser as "_BuggyConfigParser"? (that idea is only partially >> tongue-in-cheek...) > > Or we can put it in the "buggy" module which receives all buggy code. The good thing about that idea is that maintenance of buggy.py will be so simple! -- Steven
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4