On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:09:02 -0500 Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > I'm at least +0 on > > allowing trailing commas in the situation the OP mentioned. > > > > FWIW, I am also about +0.5 on allowing trailing comma. Note that in a > similar situation, the C standardization committee has erred on the > side of consistency: > > """ > A new feature of C99: a common extension in many implementations > allows a trailing comma after the list of enumeration constants. The > Committee decided to adopt this feature as an innocuous extension that > mirrors the trailing commas allowed in initializers. > """ http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/C99RationaleV5.10.pdf > > Similarly, I find allowing trailing comma in keyword only arguments > lists to be an innocuous extension that mirrors the trailing commas > allowed in the positional arguments lists. +1 from me as well. Special cases are hard to remember. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4