On 13/12/2010 11:21, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Vinay Sajip<vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> Tim Golden<mail<at> timgolden.me.uk> writes: >> >>> >>> On 13/12/2010 10:31, Vinay Sajip wrote: >>> [...] >>>> Ideally, link to the wrong doc section on docs.python.org in your bug report. >>> >>> Now that's not a piece of advice you see very often :) >>> >> >> True, but this area changed after 2.6 was released (after even 2.7, IIRC), so I >> want to be sure that if I'm going to change the doc sources on release26-maint, >> I'm doing the right thing. > > It was more a comment on the fact that, at first glance, that sentence > looks like an instuction to provide an incorrect link, rather than to > provide a link to the section of the docs that is incorrect. Just a > quirk of English grammar :) Thanks, Nick. That is what I meant. I wanted to indicate that it was tongue-in-cheek, but I never can remember the sequence of characters which means that... TJG
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4