A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-December/106767.html below:

[Python-Dev] logging doc broken

[Python-Dev] logging doc brokenVinay Sajip vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Dec 13 12:04:26 CET 2010
Tim Golden <mail <at> timgolden.me.uk> writes:

> 
> On 13/12/2010 10:31, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> [...]
> > Ideally, link to the wrong doc section on docs.python.org in your bug report.
> 
> Now that's not a piece of advice you see very often :)
> 

True, but this area changed after 2.6 was released (after even 2.7, IIRC), so I
want to be sure that if I'm going to change the doc sources on release26-maint,
I'm doing the right thing. The 2.6 docs seem consistent with the 2.6 code, and
while confusing (because the distinction between constructor param names and
attr names is not spelled out), I don't see 2.6 docs as broken (or at least, I
don't see where the breakage is).

Regards,

Vinay Sajip



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4