On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:55:25 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > > On 12/10/2010 4:59 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > > > >> Like Éric, I'm not sure what the implications of the existing module > >> having been released in 2.7 and 3.2 beta are in terms of making such an > >> API change. > > > > I am with Raymond on this: the purpose of betas is so we can test *and* make > > changes. No one should base production software on a beta release. > > It's also the key difference between betas and release candidates. Seems that both you and Terry have missed the part where the sysconfig API is already part of 2.7, though. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4