Paul Moore <p.f.moore <at> gmail.com> writes: > You misunderstand me. I know that's how those levels work. What I'm > not sure about (and I think would be interesting and potentially > useful information) is whether the individuals participating in this > thread feel that liberal use of info and debug level logging in > library code is useful. All the discussion thus far has been about > warning and error levels (mainly because people seem less comfortable > with the "suppress by default" approach for those levels, whereas it's > natural for debug and info levels). OK I see, sorry - I just didn't get that from your original choice of words. I'm probably not firing on all cylinders right now :-) > I guess I'm wondering what best practices for logging might be. > (Actually, that might make the subject of an interesting blog posting, > if you're looking for suggestions ). Thanks for the suggestion, I'll think about posting on this topic after ruminating on it for a bit. Regards, Vinay Sajip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4