On Dec 3, 2010, at 10:05 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Regardless of what I or others may have said before, I am not > currently a fan of adding transform() to either str or bytes. Just to clarify, is your preference to go back to the Python 2.x way and use encode()/decode() for both unicode encodings and other other transformations (uu, zlib, bz2, quopri, etc)? FWIW, transform()/untransform() are already in the 3.2 beta. Do you want them taken out? If so, do you want the codecs made accessible with encode/decode or have them continue to be inaccessible in 3.x? Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4