On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:43 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: ... > Now, distutils2 is different: it's *not* new functionality. So perhaps > yes: I disagree with the principle that bold rewrites should be > developed independently. Such work would be much better carried out in a > branch - it will never stand on its own. So we had several +1 on James' idea to bring back distutils2 to the trunk after 3.2 final, and it seems that you are not against this idea. So we will do this unless you object Regards Tarek -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4