Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-December/106444.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r87010 - in python/branches/py3k: Doc/library/subprocess.rst Lib/subprocess.py Lib/test/test_subprocess.py

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r87010 - in python/branches/py3k: Doc/library/subprocess.rst Lib/subprocess.py Lib/test/test_subprocess.py
• Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r87070 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_shutil.py
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 4 December 2010 22:51, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
> My feeling is that we should be able to correct bad-enough mistakes.

That's fair. Is this a "bad-enough mistake"? From a brief reading of
the 2 bug reports, combined with my own trouble-free experience with
Popen (always leaving close_fds as default), it doesn't seem so, to
me. If someone provides evidence that this is a serious bug in the
API, then that's a different matter.

Paul.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r87010 - in python/branches/py3k: Doc/library/subprocess.rst Lib/subprocess.py Lib/test/test_subprocess.py
• Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r87070 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_shutil.py
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4