On 12/01/2010 04:39 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Greg Ewing<greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: >> Nick Coghlan wrote: >> >>> For the directory-as-module-not-package idea ... >>> you would need to be very careful with it, >>> since all the files would be sharing a common globals() namespace. >> >> One of the things I like about Python's module system >> is that once I know which module a name was imported >> from, I also know which file to look in for its >> definition. If a module can be spread over several >> files, that feature would be lost. > > There are many potential problems with the idea, I just chose to > mention one of the ones that could easily make the affected code > *break* :) Right. It would require additional pieces as well. Ron :-)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4