RetroSearch Browse

Wed Aug 18 22:06:20 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-August/103133.html

Am 18.08.2010 20:59, schrieb "Martin v. Löwis":
> Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb Michael Foord:
>> Could (and should) the online Python 3.1 docs be updated to show Python
>> 2.7 as stable?
> 
> I think the answer is "no, it could not".
> 
> How many old documentation sets would you want to go through, and
> regenerate them? There is also
> 
> http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.5/
> http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.4/
> http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.3/
> 
> etc.
> 
> In particular,
> 
> http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.2/
> 
> still lists 3.1 as in-development.
> 
> If that would be fixed, I think the fix should work for all
> documentation sets, and such a fix might be difficult to implement.

Actually, the ones referred to here are the continually updated docs from
the branch head, which I just fixed to show the correct information.

I agree about the doc sets specific to releases.

Georg

-- 
Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less.
Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy
indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou
two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-August/103133.html below:

[Python-Dev] Fwd: Old link text in documentation