A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-August/103131.html below:

[Python-Dev] Fwd: Old link text in documentation

[Python-Dev] Fwd: Old link text in documentation [Python-Dev] Fwd: Old link text in documentation"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Wed Aug 18 20:59:12 CEST 2010
Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb Michael Foord:
> Could (and should) the online Python 3.1 docs be updated to show Python
> 2.7 as stable?

I think the answer is "no, it could not".

How many old documentation sets would you want to go through, and
regenerate them? There is also

http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.5/
http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.4/
http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.3/

etc.

In particular,

http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.2/

still lists 3.1 as in-development.

If that would be fixed, I think the fix should work for all
documentation sets, and such a fix might be difficult to implement.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4