A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-August/103057.html below:

[Python-Dev] Remove "unit test needed"

[Python-Dev] Remove "unit test needed" [Python-Dev] Remove "unit test needed"Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu Aug 12 19:41:51 CEST 2010
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:02:29 -0400
Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I remember there was an idea somewhere to replace "patch" tag with a
> check-list with boxes for code, tests, and docs.  I think that would
> be better than "unit test needed" stage.

To me the simpler the better. If there's a patch then it's the
reviewer's task to point out what's missing - and that's
context-dependent: some fixes don't need a doc change or a test case
(or, at least, they can do without).

The rationale is that the more complex a system is, the less likely we
are to use it. Our current "keywords" are severely under-used.

Regards

Antoine.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4