A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-August/103051.html below:

[Python-Dev] Remove "unit test needed"

[Python-Dev] Remove "unit test needed" [Python-Dev] Remove "unit test needed"Mark Dickinson dickinsm at gmail.com
Thu Aug 12 15:18:31 CEST 2010
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to see “unit test needed” removed from the workflow menu in
> the bug tracker. The reason is that we don't do test-driven development
> (or, at least, most of us don't) and this stage entry is therefore
> useless and confusing. Saying to someone that an unit test is needed
> happens during the patch review - it isn't a separate stage in itself.

Is that stage supposed to (at least partly) capture the idea
'reproducible test-case needed', or 'verification needed'?  That would
seem like a more useful notion.

Mark
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4