On 12/08/2010 11:18, Steve Holden wrote: > On 8/12/2010 5:50 AM, Tim Golden wrote: [... snip explanation of standard & non-standard locations ...] > Didn't we have this discussion when per-user libraries came up? > Shouldn't we be using a subdirectory of that location? Yes we should. My explanation above was really just painting the picture. It should have been an Appendix for the Truly Interested. > One might make a case that all configuration data should be stored in a > single SQLite database (with a suitable API to hide the relational > nature of the store). Then at least there would only be one file no > matter how many versions of Python were installed. Seriously. We are > already spending enough time doing stat calls on non-existent directories. -1 on this. I don't care how many stats we're doing; I want to be able to see my configuration / libraries etc without firing up a sqlite session. TJG
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4