On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 13:10 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: > > which would require ignoring the absence of __annotations__. > > It turns out the patch that added __annotations__ support also made a > change to make all of the copied attributes optional. The discussion happened on issue 8814. I initially made only __annotations__ optional, however, after finding issue 1576241 on the tracker and thinking about it a bit, making all of the annotations optional seemed like the only sane solution. http://bugs.python.org/issue8814 http://bugs.python.org/issue1576241 > So I'll be tidying up the implementation of that, extending it to the > updated attributes and adding unit tests to make sure they're all > optional. > > Cheers, > Nick. > -- Terrence
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4