On 7 Aug, 2010, at 10:24, Hirokazu Yamamoto wrote: > This is the idea just popped up. :-) > > #define SIG(name) if (sig_num != SIG##name) > SIG(ABRT) SIG(FPE) SIG(ILL) SIG(INT) SIG(SEGV) SIG(TERM) { > PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError, "signal number out of range"); > return NULL; > } > #undef SIG What's wrong with: switch (sig_num) { case SIGABRT: case SIGFPE: ... case SIGTERM: break; default: PyErr_SetString(...) return NULL; } That would IMO be clearer than the macro you propose. Ronald > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ronaldoussoren%40mac.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3567 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100807/bf594fd9/attachment.bin>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4