On Aug 04, 2010, at 03:15 PM, exarkun at twistedmatrix.com wrote: >On 02:51 pm, barry at python.org wrote: >>On Aug 04, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >>>I think the issue is that many core developers don't have the reflex >>>to check buildbot state after they commit some changes (or at least >>>on a regular, say weekly, basis), and so gradually the buildbots have >>>a tendency to turn from green to red, one after another. >> >>I'd classify this as a failure of the tools, not of the developers. >>>These post-commit verification steps should be proactive, and scream >>>really >loud (or >>even prevent future commits) until everything is green again. >>>Buildbots themselves can be unstable, so this may or may not be >>>workable, and >changing >>any of this will take valuable volunteer time. It's also unsexy work. > >How hard is it to look at a web page? That's not the right question :) The real questions are: how hard is it to remember how to find the appropriate web page, how hard is it to know which buildbots are *actually* stable enough to rely on, how hard is it to decipher the results to know what they're telling you? -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100804/b856fb37/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4