RetroSearch Browse

Tue Aug 3 01:04:32 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-August/102717.html

On 02/08/2010 23:43, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 17:13:01 -0500
> Benjamin Peterson<benjamin at python.org>  wrote:
>
>> 2010/8/2 Nick Coghlan<ncoghlan at gmail.com>:
>>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Benjamin Peterson<benjamin at python.org>  wrote:
>>>> I'm only referring to the infrastructure when I say "the current
>>>> setup." I don't think repeatedly tweaking the tracker is likely to
>>>> close more issues.
>>>
>>> But tweaking the tracker to improve the way we *interact* with
>>> potential contributors may get more developers in the long run, as
>>> well as closing more issues. Currently, if a bug doesn't get responded
>>> to immediately by people monitoring the bugs list, then there's no
>>> easy way to go back and query "hey, are there any bugs nobody has even
>>> looked at yet?". All this discussion is about is acknowledging that
>>> that is something we should try to keep under control by listing them
>>> in the weekly summary and by making them easy to look up.
>>
>> Well, I just feel like we keep changing things to little result,
>> creating an organic mess of fields and statuses. Adding more queries
>> is fine, but let's not bow to the temptation to add more fields.
>
> FWIW, I completely agree with Benjamin.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>

I completely disagree.

Please see my other post.

Kindest regards.

Mark Lawrence.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-August/102717.html below:

[Python-Dev] No response to posts