On 7/31/2010 5:02 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > But yes, the docs should clarify that *any* use of __*__ names, in > *any* context, that does not follow explicitly documented use, is > subject to breakage without warning. http://bugs.python.org/issue9451 Strengthen __*__ system name warning My suggested new version, incorporating Guido's sentence: System-defined names. These names are defined by the interpreter and its implementation (including the standard library). Current system names are discussed in the Special method names section and elsewhere. More will likely be defined in future versions of Python. *Any* use of __*__ names, in any* context, that does not follow explicitly documented use, is subject to breakage without warning. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4