Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> As to Guido's point about the decision making process, Nick's right. I just >> want to make sure we can capture the resolution in the PEP, be it by BDFL >> pronouncement or "hey, silence is acceptance" email. > > I don't think "silence is acceptance" will work out in practice. For > issues where a PEP was written in the first place, somebody will > *always* object, and forever so, hoping that what he considers a mistake > will not be done. The advantage of Guido acting as BDFL was that > somebody would make an decision ultimately, one which both proponents > and opponents of the PEP would accept. > > Without a BDFL, I think we need a committee to make decisions, e.g. by > majority vote amongst committers. Couldn't we just go with the FLUFL? regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 See PyCon Talks from Atlanta 2010 http://pycon.blip.tv/ Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ UPCOMING EVENTS: http://holdenweb.eventbrite.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4