Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > R. David Murray <rdmurray <at> bitdance.com> writes: > > > > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:28:47 -0700, Bill Janssen wrote: > > > 8 skips unexpected on darwin: > > > test_aepack test_applesingle test_gdb test_macos test_macostools > > > test_readline test_scriptpackages test_ttk_guionly > > > > > > Why is the skip of "test_readline" unexpected on darwin? The readline > > > on Darwin isn't what Python wants. > > > > I think someone fixed readline to work with Darwin's readline, at > > least in theory. > > The machine is likely lacking the readline development headers. > In any case, please don't focus on the skipped tests. What's important is the > failed tests. > Bill, Michael, it would be nice if you could investigate a bit more on these > failures. Well, test_grp test is failing because it assumes that group IDs are unique, which is not guaranteed by getgrent(). And apparently not true at PARC. test_posix fails on some group-related thing, too: the use of initgroups(), which is supposed to fail, succeeds. test_pwd fails because the fake uid chosen for one test is a real UID for a PARC user. So these are really problems with the test being based on an insufficiently general model of the real world. Bill
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4