RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 28 09:22:01 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-April/099817.html

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 23:55, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe the more important part of Barry's suggested change here is
> requiring a link to the archived message (usually from python-dev) where
> the PEP was accepted (be it directly by you as BDFL, or by consensus
> from a "sufficient" number of core developers). This will likely also
> help with reminding people to announce on python-dev when PEPs are
> accepted by consensus (or by you) somewhere like PyCon or a sprint.

Though maybe it should be called Conclusion instead of Accepted and
used for Rejected PEPs, as well?

Cheers,

Dirkjan

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-April/099817.html below:

[Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas