On 09:39 pm, solipsis at pitrou.net wrote: ><skip <at> pobox.com> writes: >> >> >> Sean> However, I will step up for him and say that I've known him >>a >> Sean> decade, and he's very trustworthy. He has been the >>president (we >> Sean> call that position Maximum Leader) of our Linux Users Group >>here >> Sean> for 5 years or so. >> >>Given that Sean is vouching for him I'm fine with it. > >I'm not sure I agree. Of course it could be argued the risk is minimal, >but I >think it's better if all people go through the same path of proving >their >motivation and quality of work. >And if there's something wrong with that process we'd better address it >than >give random privileges to people we like :) +1 As others have said, I don't have any problem with Sean's judgement. That's not what's being questioned here. Jean-Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4