2010/4/22 P.J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com>: > At 10:54 AM 4/22/2010 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I think I went through all the latest feedback regarding PEP 376. >> >> There will be still some work of course, on the implementation side >> (for instance the Zip issues described by PJE). >> >> But I would like to go ahead and propose PEP 376 for acceptance. > > One final (optional) question/suggestion... should we change from this (in > RECORD files): > > lib/python2.6/site-packages/docutils/__init__.pyc > > to this: > > lib/python2.6/site-packages/docutils/__init__.pyc,, > > In this way, reader code can be written as: > > for path, hash, size in csv.reader(...): > > It's not a high-priority thing, but if anybody is writing code to parse > RECORD files outside the provided API implementation (eg. system packaging > tool authors), they'll probably appreciate this. ;-) > Yes, of course. the RECORD file is supposed to be iterable using the csv reader, so that's a mistake in the PEP. Thanks for noticing, I'll fix it later today > -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4