RetroSearch Browse

Thu Apr 22 00:21:02 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-April/099621.html

Victor Stinner wrote:
> I will be very sad if someone ask me to keep bytearray filename support in 3.2 
> because I opened a lot of issues about surrogates and I would make my work 
> more diffcult :-(

I don't have an opinion one way or the other regarding bytearray, but
even if you deprecated it rather than dropping it, couldn't you just add
the surrogate support for the Unicode path and leave the bytecode path
with the legacy behaviour?

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-April/099621.html below:

[Python-Dev] Reject bytearray filename in Python 3.2