Nick Coghlan wrote: > Tobias Herp wrote: >> No deprecation or removal of the simple and convenient 'version' >> argument is needed for this. Just omit it, and build your version >> action yourself. But please notice that there are others who appreciate >> this simple way to do it and don't need more. > > One Obvious Way. > > In this case, the ambiguity of the "version=" argument is sufficient to > elevate it to the level of "attractive nuisance" (particularly given the > legacy behaviour of conflicting with typical verbosity options). The > default help for the action needs to be fixed, and there are a couple of > documentation tweaks to be made, but Steven's decision to remove the > feature has a sound rationale. Exactly my feelings. IMO, straight removal would be fine as well, but a deprecation may be more user-friendly, wrt. the existing code base. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4