On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Raymond Hettinger < raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: > ISTM that making it illegal costs cycles with giving any real benefit. > It is reasonably common to accept **kwds and then pass it down > to another function. Do we want to validate the keys of every > kwds dict on every call? Why do we even care? > IIRC, there's a performance hack in dictobject.c that keeps track of whether all of the keys are strings or not. The hack is designed so that lookup operations can call the string compare/hash functions directly if possible, rather than going through the slower PyObject_ functions. Consequently, validating **kwds should be cheap. I don't know if the the current validating of **kwds with Python functions already leverages that hack or not. -- Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D. President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC <http://stutzbachenterprises.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100416/3d6b7b57/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4